*Yesterday, the Constitutional Court ruled, by a 5-to-4 majority, that a constitutional conflict existed between the Bolojan government and Parliament regarding Emergency Government Ordinance (OUG) 38/2026, which concerns the legislation required for projects funded through the SAFE mechanism. *The Constitutional Court and #39;s ruling jeopardizes projects financed under SAFE, as new legislation must be enacted and new procurement procedures established. *All of this will lead to delays that could result in the loss of funding through this mechanism, given that the deadline for project completion is the end of 2030.
Projects funded via SAFE risk paying the price for political improvisation
Pe scurt
*Yesterday, the Constitutional Court ruled, by a 5-to-4 majority, that a constitutional conflict existed between the Bolojan government and Parliament regarding Emergency Government Ordinance (OUG) 38/2026, which concerns the legislation required for projects funded through the SAFE mechanism. *The Constitutional Court and #39;s ruling jeopardizes projects financed under SAFE, as new legislation must be enacted and new procurement procedures established. *All of this will lead to delays that could result in the loss of funding through this mechanism, given that the deadline for project completion is the end of 2030.
Citește și aceste articole
Bursa
Proiectele finanţate prin SAFE riscă să plătească preţul improvizaţiei politice
22 octombrie 2026
Monitorul de Botosani
CCR a admis sesizarea lui Grindeanu privind ordonanța SAFE. Conflict constituțional între Parlament și Guvern
22 octombrie 2026
Clasifică acest articol
Voturile cititorilor ajută la calibrarea recomandărilor și a hărții editoriale. Conectează-te pentru a vota.

